This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peña, B. M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Mandl, K. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peña, B. M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Mandl, K. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surgery

PEDIATRICS Vol. 110 No. 6 December 2002, pp. 1088-1093

Effect of an Imaging Protocol on Clinical Outcomes Among Pediatric Patients With Appendicitis

Barbara M. Garcia Peña, MD, MPH*, George A. Taylor, MD§, Steven J. Fishman, MD|| and Kenneth D. Mandl, MD, MPH{ddagger}

* Department of Emergency Medicine, Miami Children’s Hospital, Miami, Florida
{ddagger} Department of Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine
§ Departments of Radiology
|| Surgery, Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

--> Objective. In 1998, we implemented a clinical imaging protocol in which children with suspected appendicitis underwent ultrasonography (US) followed by computed tomography (CT). We sought to determine the impact of the US-CT protocol on changes in perforation and negative appendectomy rates.

Methods. Children with unequivocal presentations for appendicitis went to the operating room without entering the imaging protocol. Using a modified time series design, we analyzed a prospective and retrospective cohort of consecutive patients who were admitted from the emergency department for suspected appendicitis. The perforation and negative appendectomy rates were computed for the periods before and after implementation of the imaging protocol and adjustment for time trends was made.

Results. A total of 1338 children were identified. Eight hundred ten (60.5%) children had equivocal clinical findings. A total of 920 patients were admitted for suspected appendicitis before the protocol was implemented; 526 (57.2%) of the 920 children had appendicitis, and 186 (35.4%) of them had perforation. A total of 91 (14.7%) of 617 had negative appendectomies. After the protocol was implemented, 418 patients were admitted for suspected appendicitis; 328 (78.5%) had appendicitis with 51 (15.5%) perforated. There were 14 (4.1%) of 342 cases of negative appendectomies. After implementation of the imaging protocol, the perforation rate decreased from 35.4% to 15.5%, and the negative appendectomy rate decreased from 14.7% to 4.1%. After secular time trends were adjusted for, the imaging protocol continued to have a strong association with a reduction in perforation rate and negative appendectomy rate.

Conclusion. The implementation of an imaging protocol using US and CT resulted in a marked decrease in the perforation and negative appendectomy rates in children with suspected appendicitis.

Key Words: appendicitis • children • ultrasonography • computed tomography • negative appendectomy rate • perforation rate

Abbreviations: US, ultrasonography • CT, computed tomography • ED, emergency department

Received for publication Nov 19, 2001; Accepted Jun 18, 2002.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 RadiologyHome page
M. J. Wan, M. Krahn, W. J. Ungar, E. Caku, L. Sung, L. S. Medina, and A. S. Doria
Acute Appendicitis in Young Children: Cost-effectiveness of US versus CT in Diagnosis--A Markov Decision Analytic Model
Radiology, December 19, 2008; (2008) 2502080100.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 Emerg. Med. J.Home page
K-H Lin, W-S Leung, C-P Wang, and W-K Chen
Cost analysis of management in acute appendicitis with CT scanning under a hospital global budgeting scheme
Emerg. Med. J., March 1, 2008; 25(3): 149 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
A. B. Kharbanda, G. A. Taylor, S. J. Fishman, and R. G. Bachur
A Clinical Decision Rule to Identify Children at Low Risk for Appendicitis
Pediatrics, September 1, 2005; 116(3): 709 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
T. A. Foley, F. Earnest IV, M. A. Nathan, D. M. Hough, H. J. Schiller, and T. L. Hoskin
Differentiation of Nonperforated from Perforated Appendicitis: Accuracy of CT Diagnosis and Relationship of CT Findings to Length of Hospital Stay
Radiology, April 1, 2005; 235(1): 89 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
T. A. Ponsky, Z. J. Huang, K. Kittle, M. R. Eichelberger, J. C. Gilbert, F. Brody, and K. D. Newman
Hospital- and Patient-Level Characteristics and the Risk of Appendiceal Rupture and Negative Appendectomy in Children
JAMA, October 27, 2004; 292(16): 1977 - 1982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
G. A. Taylor
Suspected Appendicitis in Children: In Search of the Single Best Diagnostic Test
Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 293 - 295.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
H. A. Heij and M. Offringa
Effect of an Imaging Protocol on Clinical Outcomes Among Pediatric Patients With Appendicitis
Pediatrics, March 1, 2004; 113(3): 626 - 626.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
B. M. Garcia Pena, E. F. Cook, and K. D. Mandl
Selective Imaging Strategies for the Diagnosis of Appendicitis in Children
Pediatrics, January 1, 2004; 113(1): 24 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
A. M. Kosloske, C. L. Love, J. E. Rohrer, J. F. Goldthorn, and S. R. Lacey
The Diagnosis of Appendicitis in Children: Outcomes of a Strategy Based on Pediatric Surgical Evaluation
Pediatrics, January 1, 2004; 113(1): 29 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
M. M. Ziegler
The Diagnosis of Appendicitis: An Evolving Paradigm
Pediatrics, January 1, 2004; 113(1): 130 - 132.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
S. R. Reid, J. D. Losek, and B. M. G. Pena
Imaging Before Appendectomy
Pediatrics, December 1, 2003; 112(6): 1461 - 1462.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
Selections from Journal Watch Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine
Arch. Dis. Child., August 1, 2003; 88(8): 740 - 741.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JWatch PediatricsHome page
Improving Health Outcomes of Children with Appendicitis
Journal Watch Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, March 10, 2003; 2003(310): 14 - 14.
[Full Text]

Home page
 JWatch GeneralHome page
Improving Health Outcomes of Children with Appendicitis
Journal Watch (General), January 17, 2003; 2003(117): 7 - 7.
[Full Text]

Home page
 JWatch PediatricsHome page
Improving Diagnostic Accuracy in Appendicitis Through Imaging
Journal Watch Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, January 13, 2003; 2003(113): 2 - 2.
[Full Text]