This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hettler, J.
Right arrow Articles by Greenes, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hettler, J.
Right arrow Articles by Greenes, D. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice

PEDIATRICS Vol. 111 No. 3 March 2003, pp. 602-607

Can the Initial History Predict Whether a Child With a Head Injury Has Been Abused?

Joeli Hettler, MD and David S. Greenes, MD

From the Division of Emergency Medicine, Children’s Hospital, Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

--> Objective. Previous studies of child abuse have used the presenting history as part of the case definition of abuse. Thus, data from these studies cannot be used to determine the diagnostic utility of historical features for identifying cases of abuse. The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic utility of certain historical features for identifying cases of abusive head trauma.

Methods. We retrospectively studied all children, aged 0 to 3 years, who had acute traumatic intracranial injury and were admitted to a tertiary care pediatric hospital from 1993 to 2000. Cases were categorized as either "definite abuse" or "not definite abuse" on the basis of radiologic, ophthalmologic, and physical examination findings, without regard to the presenting history.

Results. Forty-nine (30%) of 163 children met the criteria for definite abuse. Having no history of trauma had a high specificity (0.97) and positive predictive value (PPV; 0.92) for abuse. Among the subgroup of patients with persistent neurologic abnormality at hospital discharge (n = 34), having a history of no or low-impact trauma had a specificity of 1.0 and a PPV of 1.0 for definite abuse. Injuries were blamed on home resuscitative efforts in 12% of definite abuse cases and 0% of not definite abuse cases. The initial history of trauma was changed in 9% of definite abuse cases, as compared with 0% of not definite abuse cases.

Conclusion. Among young children with a head injury, certain historical features have high specificity and PPV for diagnosing child abuse.

Key Words: child abuse • craniocerebral trauma • history • infant

Abbreviations: PPV, positive predictive value

Received for publication Mar 7, 2002; Accepted Aug 26, 2002.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PediatricsHome page
T. Fujiwara, M. Okuyama, and M. Miyasaka
Characteristics That Distinguish Abusive From Nonabusive Head Trauma Among Young Children Who Underwent Head Computed Tomography in Japan
Pediatrics, October 1, 2008; 122(4): e841 - e847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
R. D Sege and E. G Flaherty
Forty years later: inconsistencies in reporting of child abuse
Arch. Dis. Child., October 1, 2008; 93(10): 822 - 824.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Child MaltreatHome page
E. G. Flaherty, R. Sege, L. L. Price, K. K. Christoffel, D. P. Norton, and K. G. O'Connor
Pediatrician characteristics associated with child abuse identification and reporting: results from a national survey of pediatricians.
Child Maltreat, November 1, 2006; 11(4): 361 - 369.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 AAP Grand RoundsHome page
B. Spivack
Detection of Infant Abuse in Pediatric vs General Hospitals
AAP Grand Rounds, June 1, 2006; 15(6): 74 - 75.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
M. Trokel, A. Waddimba, J. Griffith, and R. Sege
Variation in the Diagnosis of Child Abuse in Severely Injured Infants
Pediatrics, March 1, 2006; 117(3): 722 - 728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
M. R. Sills, A. M. Libby, and H. D. Orton
Prehospital and In-Hospital Mortality: A Comparison of Intentional and Unintentional Traumatic Brain Injuries in Colorado Children
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, July 1, 2005; 159(7): 665 - 670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
M. C. Pierce, G. E. Bertocci, J. E. Janosky, F. Aguel, E. Deemer, M. Moreland, D. K. B. Boal, S. Garcia, S. Herr, N. Zuckerbraun, et al.
Femur Fractures Resulting From Stair Falls Among Children: An Injury Plausibility Model
Pediatrics, June 1, 2005; 115(6): 1712 - 1722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
H. T. Keenan, D. K. Runyan, S. W. Marshall, M. A. Nocera, and D. F. Merten
A Population-Based Comparison of Clinical and Outcome Characteristics of Young Children With Serious Inflicted and Noninflicted Traumatic Brain Injury
Pediatrics, September 1, 2004; 114(3): 633 - 639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JWatch Emergency Med.Home page
Initial History Can Identify Abuse in Head-Injured Children
Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, April 15, 2003; 2003(415): 8 - 8.
[Full Text]